The Wall Street Journal featured our research in today's paper, highlighting the shift from small cap leadership into large cap. Click here for a link to the full article. Below are more details on the analysis.
The chart below shows the Russell 3000 performance across ten groups. Group 1 contains the smallest stocks by market capitalization, while group 10 contains the largest stocks. As shown, the smallest stocks gained an average of 359.55% between 3/9/09 and 8/31/09, more than double the next-best group. The largest stocks were the worst performers during that period, gaining an average of 58.73%
If we now look at the period between 8/31/09 and 11/10/09 exactly the opposite trend has occurred. The largest stocks in the Russell 3000 performed the best, gaining an average of 7.48%, while the smallest stocks performed the worst, losing an average of 1.50%.
While we can't necessarily call this a "shift to quality" (since we're not really sure how you define "quality"), it does highlight risk aversion in the market as blue chips outperform more volatile small caps.
The same trend holds true for index returns. Between 3/9 and 8/31 the Russell 2000 was the best performer, up 66.66% vs a 45.05% gain for the DJIA. Between 8/31 and 11/10 the DJIA performed best, gaining 8.67% compared to the Russell 2000's gain of 3.77%.